Monday, August 15, 2011

GoD is dead. Beware false profits

Overall the key Company objective remains football success, as this will greatly assist revenue generation.
Celtic Chief Executive, Peter Lawwell

Once upon a time, in a land shrouded in myth, Celtic were promised a Generation of Domination.

The term was catchy and carried the allure of some days of recompense when Celtic fans would enjoy success, as some compensation for a near-decade of misery in which our rivals across the city - through double-dealing for sure - arrogantly taunted us as second-class citizens in a very parochial Scottish football world.

And for a moment, cutting through the hyperbole, things were looking good. True, the Celtic spin machine was lying to us all the way. For example, one master of figure-juggling told us that Gordon Strachan had won three titles in a row for only the third time in the club's history. And some swallowed that whole, apparently forgetting the fact that one Jock Stein had achieved three-in-a-row three times consecutively and Willie Maley had done the same twice.

For those peddling such nonsense, though, past victories had to be diminished to make a more modest achievement, impressive though it was, seem all the more remarkable. That Celtic's decline should be contrived on 5th August 2008 could hardly have been predicted by anyone. That was the day that had fans enjoying the discomfort of their rivals on hearing the scoreline: FC Kaunas 2-1 Rangers.

Rangers exited the Champions League and Celtic could only prosper from their misery, exploit their weakness and march into the Generation of Domination, securing an advantage that might never be overturned. But others at Celtic thought differently and having briefed their "independent" friends in Celtic cyberspace, we started to hear of the value of "banked cash".

Ambitious transfer plans were shelved as it was expected that more modest outlay would secure title number four.

And, despite clear difficulties on the field, despite the fact that Gordon Strachan had told Peter Lawwell that he was in his last season, something that was kept from the fans, it looked that another title might be won, such was Rangers' parlous state. Some expressed anxiety going into the infamous Willo Flood transfer window that the directors and executives thought that serious investment would not be required, a seven-point gap having been established at the top of the table.

The title was lost and, with it, Champions League revenue. They repeated the feat again, and again. We now hear little from Celtic media about how dominant a team has to be to win three titles in a row because that has the converse implication that to lose three consecutively establishes a team as firmly second-best.

All this to a club whose imminent financial collapse has been offered a comfort to Celtic fans, skirting over the shocking state a club must be in to be bested three times by rivals in financial crisis.

One thing alone has justified the near-silence from Celtic fans as the club's ethics and values have been dismantled and its directors praised for pursuing a strategy that brought few trophies, less European income, and found fewer fans willing to buy tickets. That is the debt of loyalty fans owe Neil Lennon.

But when the manager of Burnley turned down the chance to manage the club he loves so that we were left with a man who came cheap but just had his team relegated, applause from the gallery and praise of the fat-cats picking up bonuses was a dereliction of duty. Neil Lennon was given the job and has done about as well as anyone could in the circumstances.

It is those circumstances, brought about by a criminal neglect of our club, dishonestly reported and accepted by noveau riche market-watchers, that should have all Celtic fans raging with anger. John Reid leaves a club that hasn't been Scottish champions since 2008 celebrating. If there was any fire left amongst the Celtic support, he and his cosy circle would have been hounded out long ago.

Celtic are now about accounts first, media spin second and football third. Game on.

Seed Newsvine
--

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Solidarity and Celtic cyberspace

Some weeks ago, I contacted the owner of a highly successful blog asking him to stop people from posting my articles in full rather than simply using a link. I did so privately because I had not interest in a public slanging match. The first time I had asked this was two years ago and the problem had remained.

I was especially irked at the time as the article that had been reproduced had had a fund-raising link, which was not included and therefore, in my opinion, was depriving people of the chance to show solidarity with others in the Celtic family.

Despite not having been given my permission, he published my email on his blog, I suspected because he wanted his readers to react against me. He also commented that I wasn't using my real name. After finding what he had done, I sent the email below, to which he did not respond but - lo and behold - the Facebook page with more than 3,500 Celtic fans, which was being used as a sort of Celtic community was suspended due to it having used the name, The Celts Are Here, instead of that of a real person.

There are people in Celtic Cyberspace who co-operate and others who fancy themselves as the only show in town, peddling an agenda that has served Celtic poorly. This minor blog sees itself in the former category but I have been dismayed at the conduct of a fellow Celtic fan so respected by many.

The email I sent to him is below with a name removed as I thought it would be inappropriate to mention someone recently deceased as part of this dialogue.
------
When you sent this message, I suspected you were hoping for a defensive reaction from your posters against me. I'm sorry if I did you a disservice.

I was surprised that you remembered that I had asked this before - I certainly noted that you had asked people to desist from lifting the copy at that time and appreciated that. I also noted that in the instance of illegal streams, you successfully stopped them being posted to your blog but similar diligence had not been so successful regarding others' copyright. This has happened on other occasions but I had let the matter drop.

However, given the tragic news of that day, I thought you would have left the matter there, especially as I had not given you permission to publish my email. That's not because I don't stand by it but because private correspondence and "letters for publication" are distinctly different.

I was, like many others, deeply saddened by the news that [name deleted] had died and, having never wanted a public spat, especially at this time of the season (hence my private message to you), didn't for one second contemplate that you would have interspersed the match report and the news of the death of a highly respected fan with publication of my private email. (And, since you now refer to yourself as a publishing company, you might do well to look into the copyright rules regarding correspondence).

As far as I can see, you got two posters giving you the reaction you wanted, one person advising you as to your responsibilities, and many people focusing their attentions more appropriately.

Several people asked me to "name and shame" on the issue, something I declined to do, both because I thought the matter could be dealt with directly and because I thought this was no time to take a swipe at a blog on which [name deleted] was so prominent. It was only this evening that I was directed to your post by someone else. I trust you are satisfied with your conduct over the entire matter.

Seed Newsvine
--