It was announced on
Friday, with no fanfare whatsoever, that John Park had left Celtic.
John Who? The
majority of Celtic fans who have taken a close interest in the club’s
operations over the past few years will know the name well.
 |
| Football Operations: John Park and Peter Lawwell |
I should state here
that no criticism of John Park is implied – I have no doubt that he
did hs job exactly as he was expected to do.
However, despite
constant denials from Celtic – and successive coaches, who may have
been contractually obliged not to comment on negative aspects of the
workings of the club – suspicions remained that Park’s role was
not always consistent with the footballing aims of the manager/head
coach, whatever we are supposed to call him.
The alarm bells
first started to ring shortly after Gordon Strachan left the club.
Overall, Strachan did an exceptional job for us and should be thanked
for that. However, shortly after he left he made a cryptic statement
indicating that he would never again sign a player he hadn’t seen.
During Strachan’s
time, Celtic signed Thomas Gravesen and Roy Keane – both of whom he
had assuredly seen, but neither of whom he apparently wanted.
Keane, in his
inimitable style, went on to say that his future manager’s absolute
disinterest in having him as a player was an extra motivation to sign
– an “up you, Gordon!”
Gravesen was a
different case in point, altogether. Stilliyan Petrov had gone to
Aston Villa, having been kind enough to sign a contract with Celtic,
meaning that the club would get £7.5 million pounds for him, when he
could have landed a much fatter deal by letting the contract run
down.
Gravesen was then
brought in, meaning that Celtic landed a Galactico to replace Petrov,
and pocketed a whopping profit at the same time. Great!
Gravesen was a
tremendous player – built like a brick sh*t-house, with an
irrestible drive and energy that allowed him to dominate the middle
of the park. In that regard, he was much like Victor Wanyama but he
also had an attacking instinct and a powerful shot that persuaded
Real Madrid that he could transpose those qualities to La Liga.
But there was a
problem – Gordon didn’t want him and this established pro was
neither able nor willing to change his style of play to suit the more
controlled passing game that Strachan favoured.
It still seems
surreal to recall that many people thought that Gravesen wasn’t
good enough for us. He certainly was – but RIGHT for us at the
time; maybe not.
Roy Keane was a
different case altogether. Keano is one of a select band of players
who I admired greatly in a pre-Celtic career before finding that the
reality of him in a Celtic shirt was one inextricably-linked to an
image of him as an utter ******le.
Both Keane and
Gravesen were known quantities – but the warning signs were there.
Our manager was being asked to work with players he didn’t know –
like Du Wei, for example.
Many of us rang the
alarm bells at the time but we were mocked by those who thought
themselves the more “intellectual” Celtic fans. You know them –
the ones who talked about “The Plan”.
The Plan (as another
blog noted this week) seemed to involve John Park being a de facto
Director of Football, with Peter Lawwell doing the contract stuff
while Park identified the players in his “roving” role.
We were told that this was what was needed, rather than the "homespun" approach of Celtic managers signing players they have identified.
We signed some good
players – Forster, Wanyama, Van Dijk – and sold them to
Southampton as soon as they offered eight figures. For this, Peter
was rewarded greatly and, we must presume, Park was, too.
We also signed
players who would walk into the all-time Hall-of-Guff, should such a
thing ever exist. But that didn’t seem to matter – six flops were
more than offset by one £10m pay-off.
Those of us who protested were decried as fools. We were asked how much money we wanted to
spend and told that amount would bankrupt the club – even though we
had never answered the question.
We were reminded of
the mantra of The Plan, an entity lauded by the followers of one site
(who routinely referred to its owner as if he was a knight of the
realm). Those who couldn’t or wouldn’t sign up to said scheme of
modernism were labelled as naive, wreckers who would see the club
bankrupted.
There was to be no
middle-ground between reckless spending and feckless recruitment with
a view to player-trading being the primary function of the club.
We were reminded of
Porto – we never came close to Porto’s achievements.
“Celtic fans” --
the new kind who understood business better than the common-or-garden
“beggin’-yir-pardon-sir” plebeians – told us that the balance
sheet was what mattered most of all.
What – you want to
watch a good team, playing good football with aspirations to raising
the standards year-by-year? “I suppose you think we should spend
£12m on the likes of Tore Andro Flo? No? How much should we spend -
£20m, £30m? Do you have any idea how well we’re run?”
Buy your ticket and
shut your mouth was the mantra.
And yet – look
what has happened.
The Plan has
changed. Why? (Whisper it.) Because The Plan failed.
The Plan, which saw
Celtic radically under-invest in the post-Rangers years, also brought
Euopean failure, fans expressing apathy and anger, the club giving
the Head Coach’s job to a virtual rookie and key players in the
squad sold from under him.
And what was the
response to this failure?
That is something
you are never likely to hear from the “new realists” who lavished
praise on the Celtic knight, while they munched their prawn
sandwiches, laughing about their pie-eating, team-on-the-park days.
How many dissenters
ever said we had to spend £10m-£20m, however hard the saints of
Peter’s rapid news site asked? Few, if any. On the other hand, many
welcomed the change of approach for this season.
A manager – not
just Head Coach – who is in charge of the football operation
because he understands it better than anyone. I’ll admit that I
wasn’t convinced that Brendan Rodgers would be the best choice for
us because I’ve always been suspicious of “highly-regarded”
picks.
I cannot give him
the backing that he has given to Scott Brown as both regular readers
of this blog will know that I never give more that 100% to anything –
it’s illogical.
But what have we
seen – Moussa Dembele, who had shown his potential in the English
Championship, persuaded to come to Celtic for the next stage of his
development.
This was not part of
The Plan.
Those of us who are
old enough need only cast our minds back to the tears Henrik Larsson
shed when it seemed as if Feyenoord would scupper his move to Celtic.
That was not to do with love for Celtic at that time but, as Henrik
said, he had seen how Pierre Van Hoojidonk had developed.
Neither was it part
of The Plan – it was a straightforward reaction by a player who had
potential, recognising that he could emulate or exceed Van
Hoojidonk’s achievements, if only given the chance.
That’s one of the
reasons why Dembele is such a great signing for us. It’s not just
because we have such an exceptional player (whose comments on
receiving player-of-the-month were just what every Celtic fan would
love to hear).
But, when Moussa
signed, Zinedine Zidane said it was a logical move for a player he
had been watching. Zizou said he had to score in the Champions League
– Moussa duly scored. France Under-21 caps – two goals in two
games, drawing praise from Didier Deschamps, who has already
discussed bringing him into the top squad.
This seems lost on
some people – we have a manager who was influential in the
development of Raheem Sterling and Luis Suarez and who Steven Gerrard
described as the best one-to-one coach he had ever worked with.
His initial work
with Dembele will also be noted by other players whose aspirations
match Moussa’s – to play in the Champions League and get the
attention of the coach of one of the elite European national teams.
If Moussa can get
his full call-up for France, why couldn’t any other French, German,
Italian, Spanish, Portuguese or English player seek to follow his
path at Celtic?
That wasn’t The
Plan – find some potential, give them a couple of seasons to show
their licks, sell the best for big money. Figure out what to do with
the rest.
The Plan would never
have brought Henrik to Celtic and this is the time for those
criticised for objecting to it, to recognise that.
There are two other
distinctly “off-plan” signings but the sort who idiots like me
always sought (you know, we were hell-bent on the destruction of the
club).
Signing Kolo Toure
did not fit The Plan. He was a “diminishing asset” before Brendan
Rodgers persuaded him to leave Liverpool, where fans expected him to
be offered another contract.
What Kolo has become
is more than a defensive rock – he is the defensive coach in-situ;
the guy who knows exactly what has to be done, where players should
be and the decisions they should make. Any defender who doesn’t
learn from playing with Toure will demonstrate much about his future
potential.
(In this, he is
adding value to his defensive cohorts, Plan followers.)
And the third
“off-plan” player is – of course Scott Sinclair. Sinclair
epitomises something else that we should be seeking to exploit – a
player with abundant skill, who has had a hiatus in his career, but
who an astute manager can assist towards fulfilling his full
potential.
Players like Scotty
don’t make any sense according to The Plan – you take someone who
is paid a massive salary and invest a great deal to persuade him that
he should come to Celtic and, if he has sufficient belief, might
flourish again; even maybe play in the Champions League.
Once upon a time, it
was Chris Sutton – devastating with Norwich City and Blackburn
Rovers – but discarded by a too-rich club who paid £10m for him
while most of the English media chose to forget how good a player he
was.
Chris Sutton is one
of the best Celtic players I have seen with my own eyes. Scott
Sinclair need only look to him for inspiration.
There is, though, a
fourth issue, and that is about keeping players. For that, look no
further than Kieran Tierney. With major clubs said to be ready to
offer in the region of the magic £10m, Kieran actually chose to sign
a long-term deal with Celtic, the club he supports.
I’m not the only
Celtic fan who gulped a little bit of emotion when KT chose to stay
with us, a Celtic supporter ready to fulfill his dreams in a Celtic
shirt. But again, many of us suspect that the prospect of working
with off-Plan Brendan Rodgers was significant.
This is not The Plan
– but neither are Celtic facing bankruptcy. In fact, the club is
enjoying just the sort of financial rewards hoped-for by non-Plan
exponents, while The Planners were espousing the benefits of the
Europa League, instead of the other tournament we were supposed to
qualify for, three years out of five.
It is worth
remembering that nothing has been won this season. Fans and players
need to be conscious of that. And it was wonderful to hear Pep
Guardiola defining what it means to pull on a Celtic shirt – to win
every week. When Pep is paying homage to the values of the club, it
can also serve as a reminder that complacency never fits with being a
Celtic player.
We respect the
opposition, no matter who they are, and play to win.
We know that we do
not have a divine right to win and that every point or victory must
be earned on the park.
These are the values
and ethos of the club – not any immutable Plan, supported by people
who could well be called propagandists.
A proper manager who
knows what he is doing (with astutely-chosen professional
assistants), leading the football operations of the club – in
charge of signing policy.
That’s not The
Plan – but it’s what reckless fans like me thought could work,
all along.
Some Celtic “fans”
probably hope we’re wrong.
