Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Four points good – two points bad for Celtic against Borussia Mönchengladbach

There’s nothing quite like being in the Champions League to quicken the pulse a little and that Wednesday morning rise seem a little more appealing (unless the match is on a Tuesday, of course), knowing that most of the cares of the day will likely dissolve with the excited anticipation of the match ahead.



When your team’s most recent outing has been a stirring performance and an encouraging result, the positive vibes resonate a little more strongly.

Celtic fans hardly need reminding that the 14 days covering our head-to-head with Borussia Mönchengladbach are likely to be the most crucial of the season.

Mönchengladbach are not just a very good team – the are a great club, as people of my age, who remember their “Golden Years” will know well.

An early football memory is of one of my primary school classmates asking me if I knew who was playing that night. “Borussia Mönchengladbach”, he said proud of his ability to pronounce the name someone had written on a piece of paper for him.

I went home and did the same thing. With a little bit of help from the Internet, I can tell you the precise date: 25th May 1977.

At that time, I was oblivious to the fact that it was the tenth anniversary of Celtic’s European Cup triumph in Lisbon (though the commentators would surely have said so through the fuzzy sound and apologies for picture quality that only seemed to add to the crackling drama of such nights) but the final against Liverpool that night was a clash of two European giants, in the days when the game seemed a little more pure.

Some of the names from that team, though, resonated through the ages, Berti Vogts, Rainer Bonhof, Allan Simonsen (one of the early greats of Scandinavian football), Uli Stielike. A certain Jupp Heynckes, who also played, would go on to managerial greatness.

Liverpool called on giants like Phil Neal, Jimmy Case, the late Emlyn Hughes, Terry McDermott and, of course Kevin Keegan.

Liverpool and Keegan would win the cup, before the poster boy of English football went to join SV Hamburg, replaced by our own “King” Kenny Dalglish, breaking the hearts of Celtic fans everywhere.
Allan Simonsen: The original Danish Dynamite

Keegan would take over from Simonsen as European Footballer of the Year, while Dalglish would usurp Keegan's place in Liverpool's history.





It’s apposite to recall these days now to remind ourselves that Borussia Mönchengladbach is a club of real European pedigree who will draw on that historic tradition over this Champions League campaign.

So forget Mönchengladbach’s away form – any notions that we will face anything like a comfortable task should be scotched right now. These two matches will take every scrap of our endeavour, every moment of skill and above all, unrelenting professionalism from every Celtic player on show.

It will also require every decibel of relentless singing and chanting that the Celtic faithful can deliver.

A win tomorrow will not be enough, despite some complacent comments to the contrary.

I believe that two wins is too much to hope for, just as I believe that Mönchengladbach will not leave the competition without recording at least one win.

Mönchengladbach don’t yet have a point on the board but we – let’s not forget – have a negative-7 goal difference, to their five. Going into the last two matches without a single-point advantage and an inferior goal difference would leave us perilously close to exiting Europe.

So a win tomorrow is vital; a win by two goals would be amazing. That would leave us all but guaranteed third place, should we secure a draw in Germany.

Failing that, if we should end up with a win each, at least levelling that goal difference would give us more than a fighting chance.
Spare a thought for Oskar
Halliday and his family.
RIP

Arguably the most dangerous outcome would be a narrow win at Celtic Park leading to the complacent believe that we would be almost home and dry, as far as European football is concerned.

The last round of matches is always a lottery as, should Barcelona or Manchester City have won the group before the last match, they would most likely rest several of their top players.

So, we should be cheering for our friends in Catalunya, too, (and maybe we’ve made new friends in Manchester), as it could be vital to our interests that City face Mönchengladbach, needing at least a point.

Brendan Rodgers isn’t talking about the Europa League and he’s to be commended for that. But our immediate job is to secure third place. Then we can dream.

* And a final note, with the notable exception of Kevin Keegan’s old German team, every Celtic fan I know has always spoken of how warmly received the fans have been in Germany. I expect that to continue in Mönchengladbach, so I hope that their fans will be accorded the welcome they assuredly deserve – until the game starts.

Sunday, October 16, 2016

What about the plan, Celtic? The vindication of the fools


It was announced on Friday, with no fanfare whatsoever, that John Park had left Celtic.

John Who? The majority of Celtic fans who have taken a close interest in the club’s operations over the past few years will know the name well.

Football Operations: John Park and Peter Lawwell
Having been at Hibs and credited with the discovery of Scott Brown, Kevin Thomson, Derek Riordan and Garry O’Connor, among others, it wasn’t surprising that Park would have been seen as an attractive target for Celtic. What club wouldn’t want a guy who had a track record of unearthing local talent that went on to earn international caps?

I should state here that no criticism of John Park is implied – I have no doubt that he did hs job exactly as he was expected to do.

However, despite constant denials from Celtic – and successive coaches, who may have been contractually obliged not to comment on negative aspects of the workings of the club – suspicions remained that Park’s role was not always consistent with the footballing aims of the manager/head coach, whatever we are supposed to call him.

The alarm bells first started to ring shortly after Gordon Strachan left the club. Overall, Strachan did an exceptional job for us and should be thanked for that. However, shortly after he left he made a cryptic statement indicating that he would never again sign a player he hadn’t seen.

During Strachan’s time, Celtic signed Thomas Gravesen and Roy Keane – both of whom he had assuredly seen, but neither of whom he apparently wanted.

Keane, in his inimitable style, went on to say that his future manager’s absolute disinterest in having him as a player was an extra motivation to sign – an “up you, Gordon!”

Gravesen was a different case in point, altogether. Stilliyan Petrov had gone to Aston Villa, having been kind enough to sign a contract with Celtic, meaning that the club would get £7.5 million pounds for him, when he could have landed a much fatter deal by letting the contract run down.

Gravesen was then brought in, meaning that Celtic landed a Galactico to replace Petrov, and pocketed a whopping profit at the same time. Great!

Gravesen was a tremendous player – built like a brick sh*t-house, with an irrestible drive and energy that allowed him to dominate the middle of the park. In that regard, he was much like Victor Wanyama but he also had an attacking instinct and a powerful shot that persuaded Real Madrid that he could transpose those qualities to La Liga.

But there was a problem – Gordon didn’t want him and this established pro was neither able nor willing to change his style of play to suit the more controlled passing game that Strachan favoured.

It still seems surreal to recall that many people thought that Gravesen wasn’t good enough for us. He certainly was – but RIGHT for us at the time; maybe not.

Roy Keane was a different case altogether. Keano is one of a select band of players who I admired greatly in a pre-Celtic career before finding that the reality of him in a Celtic shirt was one inextricably-linked to an image of him as an utter ******le.

Both Keane and Gravesen were known quantities – but the warning signs were there. Our manager was being asked to work with players he didn’t know – like Du Wei, for example.

Many of us rang the alarm bells at the time but we were mocked by those who thought themselves the more “intellectual” Celtic fans. You know them – the ones who talked about “The Plan”.

The Plan (as another blog noted this week) seemed to involve John Park being a de facto Director of Football, with Peter Lawwell doing the contract stuff while Park identified the players in his “roving” role.

We were told that this was what was needed, rather than the "homespun" approach of Celtic managers signing players they have identified.

We signed some good players – Forster, Wanyama, Van Dijk – and sold them to Southampton as soon as they offered eight figures. For this, Peter was rewarded greatly and, we must presume, Park was, too.

We also signed players who would walk into the all-time Hall-of-Guff, should such a thing ever exist. But that didn’t seem to matter – six flops were more than offset by one £10m pay-off.

Those of us who protested were decried as fools. We were asked how much money we wanted to spend and told that amount would bankrupt the club – even though we had never answered the question.

We were reminded of the mantra of The Plan, an entity lauded by the followers of one site (who routinely referred to its owner as if he was a knight of the realm). Those who couldn’t or wouldn’t sign up to said scheme of modernism were labelled as naive, wreckers who would see the club bankrupted.

There was to be no middle-ground between reckless spending and feckless recruitment with a view to player-trading being the primary function of the club.

We were reminded of Porto – we never came close to Porto’s achievements.

“Celtic fans” -- the new kind who understood business better than the common-or-garden “beggin’-yir-pardon-sir” plebeians – told us that the balance sheet was what mattered most of all.

What – you want to watch a good team, playing good football with aspirations to raising the standards year-by-year? “I suppose you think we should spend £12m on the likes of Tore Andro Flo? No? How much should we spend - £20m, £30m? Do you have any idea how well we’re run?”

Buy your ticket and shut your mouth was the mantra.

And yet – look what has happened.

The Plan has changed. Why? (Whisper it.) Because The Plan failed.

The Plan, which saw Celtic radically under-invest in the post-Rangers years, also brought Euopean failure, fans expressing apathy and anger, the club giving the Head Coach’s job to a virtual rookie and key players in the squad sold from under him.

And what was the response to this failure?

That is something you are never likely to hear from the “new realists” who lavished praise on the Celtic knight, while they munched their prawn sandwiches, laughing about their pie-eating, team-on-the-park days.

How many dissenters ever said we had to spend £10m-£20m, however hard the saints of Peter’s rapid news site asked? Few, if any. On the other hand, many welcomed the change of approach for this season.

A manager – not just Head Coach – who is in charge of the football operation because he understands it better than anyone. I’ll admit that I wasn’t convinced that Brendan Rodgers would be the best choice for us because I’ve always been suspicious of “highly-regarded” picks.

I cannot give him the backing that he has given to Scott Brown as both regular readers of this blog will know that I never give more that 100% to anything – it’s illogical.

But what have we seen – Moussa Dembele, who had shown his potential in the English Championship, persuaded to come to Celtic for the next stage of his development.

This was not part of The Plan.

Those of us who are old enough need only cast our minds back to the tears Henrik Larsson shed when it seemed as if Feyenoord would scupper his move to Celtic. That was not to do with love for Celtic at that time but, as Henrik said, he had seen how Pierre Van Hoojidonk had developed.

Neither was it part of The Plan – it was a straightforward reaction by a player who had potential, recognising that he could emulate or exceed Van Hoojidonk’s achievements, if only given the chance.

That’s one of the reasons why Dembele is such a great signing for us. It’s not just because we have such an exceptional player (whose comments on receiving player-of-the-month were just what every Celtic fan would love to hear).

But, when Moussa signed, Zinedine Zidane said it was a logical move for a player he had been watching. Zizou said he had to score in the Champions League – Moussa duly scored. France Under-21 caps – two goals in two games, drawing praise from Didier Deschamps, who has already discussed bringing him into the top squad.

This seems lost on some people – we have a manager who was influential in the development of Raheem Sterling and Luis Suarez and who Steven Gerrard described as the best one-to-one coach he had ever worked with.

His initial work with Dembele will also be noted by other players whose aspirations match Moussa’s – to play in the Champions League and get the attention of the coach of one of the elite European national teams.

If Moussa can get his full call-up for France, why couldn’t any other French, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese or English player seek to follow his path at Celtic?

That wasn’t The Plan – find some potential, give them a couple of seasons to show their licks, sell the best for big money. Figure out what to do with the rest.

The Plan would never have brought Henrik to Celtic and this is the time for those criticised for objecting to it, to recognise that.

There are two other distinctly “off-plan” signings but the sort who idiots like me always sought (you know, we were hell-bent on the destruction of the club).

Signing Kolo Toure did not fit The Plan. He was a “diminishing asset” before Brendan Rodgers persuaded him to leave Liverpool, where fans expected him to be offered another contract.

What Kolo has become is more than a defensive rock – he is the defensive coach in-situ; the guy who knows exactly what has to be done, where players should be and the decisions they should make. Any defender who doesn’t learn from playing with Toure will demonstrate much about his future potential.

(In this, he is adding value to his defensive cohorts, Plan followers.)

And the third “off-plan” player is – of course Scott Sinclair. Sinclair epitomises something else that we should be seeking to exploit – a player with abundant skill, who has had a hiatus in his career, but who an astute manager can assist towards fulfilling his full potential.

Players like Scotty don’t make any sense according to The Plan – you take someone who is paid a massive salary and invest a great deal to persuade him that he should come to Celtic and, if he has sufficient belief, might flourish again; even maybe play in the Champions League.

Once upon a time, it was Chris Sutton – devastating with Norwich City and Blackburn Rovers – but discarded by a too-rich club who paid £10m for him while most of the English media chose to forget how good a player he was.

Chris Sutton is one of the best Celtic players I have seen with my own eyes. Scott Sinclair need only look to him for inspiration.

There is, though, a fourth issue, and that is about keeping players. For that, look no further than Kieran Tierney. With major clubs said to be ready to offer in the region of the magic £10m, Kieran actually chose to sign a long-term deal with Celtic, the club he supports.

I’m not the only Celtic fan who gulped a little bit of emotion when KT chose to stay with us, a Celtic supporter ready to fulfill his dreams in a Celtic shirt. But again, many of us suspect that the prospect of working with off-Plan Brendan Rodgers was significant.

This is not The Plan – but neither are Celtic facing bankruptcy. In fact, the club is enjoying just the sort of financial rewards hoped-for by non-Plan exponents, while The Planners were espousing the benefits of the Europa League, instead of the other tournament we were supposed to qualify for, three years out of five.

It is worth remembering that nothing has been won this season. Fans and players need to be conscious of that. And it was wonderful to hear Pep Guardiola defining what it means to pull on a Celtic shirt – to win every week. When Pep is paying homage to the values of the club, it can also serve as a reminder that complacency never fits with being a Celtic player.

We respect the opposition, no matter who they are, and play to win.

We know that we do not have a divine right to win and that every point or victory must be earned on the park.

These are the values and ethos of the club – not any immutable Plan, supported by people who could well be called propagandists.

A proper manager who knows what he is doing (with astutely-chosen professional assistants), leading the football operations of the club – in charge of signing policy.

That’s not The Plan – but it’s what reckless fans like me thought could work, all along.

Some Celtic “fans” probably hope we’re wrong.